« The real cause of Dewey’s downfall: Optimism | Main | Pricing tip of the month: To bid a fixed price, focus on future costs, not past costs »

July 25, 2012

Sustaining progress in legal project management: The case of Gray Plant Mooty (Part 2 of 2)

This post was written by Jim Hassett and Jonathan Groner.

In Part 1 of this post, we discussed how Gray Plant Mooty has trained 18 of its attorneys and senior staff in legal project management (LPM) and followed it up with an LPM Sustainability Initiative to embed the concepts of project management deeply into the firm’s culture.

Of the practice groups that have made the most progress, the labor and employment group is near the top of the chart.  In all honesty, this has been surprising to firm insiders, including Judy Langevin the senior partner who has led the labor and employment effort. 

When Steve Barrett interviewed Judy before the first workshop, she discussed her skepticism about the program and about LPM.  Due to a last minute work conflict, she was forced to drop out of the first program the day before the video workshop.  (As noted in Part 1, Judy’s place was taken by Finance Director Shelbie O’Brien, which turned out to enable some serendipitous success in improving how Aderant was used to plan and track budgets.) 

But Judy signed up for the second workshop, and ended up becoming one of LPM’s strongest supporters.  Her action items involved developing documents based on project management principles that can be used in their daily client work.  Specifically, she created templates to streamline wage and hour compliance audits.  She developed a prototype statement of work, a work breakdown structure and sample budgets for use in planning, staffing and pricing the audits.  This ultimately led to a document that outlines the procedures for conducting an audit of an employer’s classification of employees and compliance with federal wage-hour laws. It lists the types of information that the lawyers normally collect from the client and the factors affecting the fees to be charged.

After our just-in-time program was complete, Judy and her partners continued to create other templates, including one for estimating the costs of a litigation matter from the initial response to a lawsuit through the end of trial, with provisions for high and low estimates depending on the nature of the litigation, and several independent contractor audits and I-9 compliance audits (both ready to use) and labor, social media, and internship audits (all nearly complete and ready to use within the next few weeks).

As a result of this experience, Judy came to believe that the process of LPM is not some deep dark secret to be mastered by a select few, but rather a systematic and disciplined application of best practices from law firm and business management.

“What LPM is really all about is to have the right people doing the right work at the right time, to increase client value,” said Langevin.  “It includes clear communication with clients about what makes up the tasks that a lawyer does.  This became an excellent vehicle to get us to talk with our clients about our work, which is something we should be doing anyway. It’s a great way to tell clients, ‘Here’s what we can predict and control in your matters, and here’s what it will cost.’”

Langevin is now an active participant in the firm’s monthly LPM Sustainability Initiative meetings.  In addition, she has asked each of the 12 members of her practice group to come to this month’s retreat with at least one concrete idea on how to use legal project management in their practice.

“We are introducing these concepts into the fabric of what we do,” Langevin said.  “Perhaps this is somewhat slower than what some aficionados would prefer, but we want all the attorneys to feel good about it. If we try to shove it down people’s throats, it’s not going to work.” 

She does not tell other attorneys at the firm: “Go find a project, then manage it.” Rather, she asks them, “What do you do on a regular basis that can help you be more efficient for a client?” This way, she says, project management “sounds less like a buzzword, and more a matter of simply doing a better job of what we’re already doing.”

None of the activities are rocket science.  The hardest part of LPM is getting lawyers started.

Langevin has changed from a skeptic to a believer, and says that as a result of this experience: “Legal project management has fundamentally changed the way I practice law.”

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c72a653ef0176167a9c4d970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Sustaining progress in legal project management: The case of Gray Plant Mooty (Part 2 of 2):

Comments

I am on vacation, and will be out of the office until Wednesday August 8. If you need immediate assistance please call Elisabeth Westner at 617-217-2578.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

My Photo
Selected Top Blog: ABA TECHSHOW 2010
Selected Top Blog: ABA TECHSHOW 2009
Selected Top Blog: TechnoLawyer
Selected Top Blog: Legal Marketing Reader

Search blog

Email future posts to me

Custom blog design by Ginny Weaver Design